Asymptotic Properties of False Discovery Rate Controlling Procedures
Under Independence
This paper investigates the performance of a family of multiple comparison procedures which have been designed to provide strong control of the False Discovery Rate (). The is the expected False Discovery Proportion (), that is, the expected fraction of false rejections among all rejected hypotheses. Starting from the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure [1], a number of refinements have been proposed to increase power by estimating the proportion of true null hypotheses, either explicitly, leading to plug-in procedures [3,20] or implicitly, leading to adaptive procedures [5,7]. In this paper we use a variant of the stochastic process approach proposed by Genovese and Wasserman [11] to study the fluctuations of the achieved by each of these procedures around its expectation when tested hypotheses are independent. We introduce a framework that allows us to derive generic Central Limit Theorems for the of these procedures, and characterize the associated regularity conditions. We interpret recently proposed adaptive procedures [5,7] as fixed points of the iteration of well-known plug-in procedures [3,20].
View on arXiv