ResearchTrend.AI
  • Papers
  • Communities
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Pricing
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 1203.5026
43
4

On the Power of Centralization in Distributed Processing

22 March 2012
Kuang Xu
ArXivPDFHTML
Abstract

In this thesis, we propose and analyze a multi-server model that captures a performance trade-off between centralized and distributed processing. In our model, a fraction ppp of an available resource is deployed in a centralized manner (e.g., to serve a most-loaded station) while the remaining fraction 1−p1-p1−p is allocated to local servers that can only serve requests addressed specifically to their respective stations. Using a fluid model approach, we demonstrate a surprising phase transition in the steady-state delay, as ppp changes: in the limit of a large number of stations, and when any amount of centralization is available (p>0p>0p>0), the average queue length in steady state scales as log⁡1/(1−p)1/(1−λ)\log_{1/(1-p)} 1/(1-\lambda)log1/(1−p)​1/(1−λ) when the traffic intensity λ\lambdaλ goes to 1. This is exponentially smaller than the usual M/M/1-queue delay scaling of 1/(1−λ)1/(1-\lambda)1/(1−λ), obtained when all resources are fully allocated to local stations (p=0p=0p=0). This indicates a strong qualitative impact of even a small degree of centralization. We prove convergence to a fluid limit, and characterize both the transient and steady-state behavior of the finite system, in the limit as the number of stations NNN goes to infinity. We show that the sequence of queue-length processes converges to a unique fluid trajectory (over any finite time interval, as NNN approaches infinity, and that this fluid trajectory converges to a unique invariant state vIv^IvI, for which a simple closed-form expression is obtained. We also show that the steady-state distribution of the NNN-server system concentrates on vIv^IvI as NNN goes to infinity.

View on arXiv
Comments on this paper