ResearchTrend.AI
  • Papers
  • Communities
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Pricing
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 1307.4953
95
72
v1v2v3 (latest)

Computing exact D-optimal designs by mixed integer second order cone programming

18 July 2013
G. Sagnol
Radoslav Harman
ArXiv (abs)PDFHTML
Abstract

Let the design of an experiment be represented by an sss-dimensional vector w\mathbf{w}w of weights with non-negative components. Let the quality of w\mathbf{w}w for the estimation of the parameters of the statistical model be measured by the criterion of DDD-optimality defined as the mmm-th root of the determinant of the information matrix M(w)=∑i=1swiAiAiTM(\mathbf{w})=\sum_{i=1}^s w_iA_iA_i^TM(w)=∑i=1s​wi​Ai​AiT​, where AiA_iAi​, i=1,...,si=1,...,si=1,...,s, are known matrices with mmm rows. In the paper, we show that the criterion of DDD-optimality is second-order cone representable. As a result, the method of second order cone programming can be used to compute an approximate DDD-optimal design with any system of linear constraints on the vector of weights. More importantly, the proposed characterization allows us to compute an \emph{exact} DDD-optimal design, which is possible thanks to high-quality branch-and-cut solvers specialized to solve mixed integer second order cone programming problems. We prove that some other widely used criteria are also second order cone representable, for instance the criteria of AAA-, and GGG-optimality, as well as the criteria of DKD_KDK​- and AKA_KAK​-optimality, which are extensions of DDD-, and AAA-optimality used in the case when only a specific system of linear combinations of parameters is of interest. We present several numerical examples demonstrating the efficiency and universality of the proposed method. We show that in many cases the mixed integer second order cone programming approach allows us to find a provably optimal exact design, while the standard heuristics systematically miss the optimum.

View on arXiv
Comments on this paper