ResearchTrend.AI
  • Papers
  • Communities
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Pricing
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 1311.3158
45
211

Fingerprinting Codes and the Price of Approximate Differential Privacy

13 November 2013
Mark Bun
Jonathan R. Ullman
Salil P. Vadhan
    FedML
ArXivPDFHTML
Abstract

We show new lower bounds on the sample complexity of (ε,δ)(\varepsilon, \delta)(ε,δ)-differentially private algorithms that accurately answer large sets of counting queries. A counting query on a database D∈({0,1}d)nD \in (\{0,1\}^d)^nD∈({0,1}d)n has the form "What fraction of the individual records in the database satisfy the property qqq?" We show that in order to answer an arbitrary set Q\mathcal{Q}Q of ≫nd\gg nd≫nd counting queries on DDD to within error ±α\pm \alpha±α it is necessary that n \geq \tilde{\Omega}\Bigg(\frac{\sqrt{d} \log |\mathcal{Q}|}{\alpha^2 \varepsilon} \Bigg). This bound is optimal up to poly-logarithmic factors, as demonstrated by the Private Multiplicative Weights algorithm (Hardt and Rothblum, FOCS'10). In particular, our lower bound is the first to show that the sample complexity required for accuracy and (ε,δ)(\varepsilon, \delta)(ε,δ)-differential privacy is asymptotically larger than what is required merely for accuracy, which is O(log⁡∣Q∣/α2)O(\log |\mathcal{Q}| / \alpha^2)O(log∣Q∣/α2). In addition, we show that our lower bound holds for the specific case of kkk-way marginal queries (where ∣Q∣=2k(dk)|\mathcal{Q}| = 2^k \binom{d}{k}∣Q∣=2k(kd​)) when α\alphaα is not too small compared to ddd (e.g. when α\alphaα is any fixed constant). Our results rely on the existence of short \emph{fingerprinting codes} (Boneh and Shaw, CRYPTO'95, Tardos, STOC'03), which we show are closely connected to the sample complexity of differentially private data release. We also give a new method for combining certain types of sample complexity lower bounds into stronger lower bounds.

View on arXiv
Comments on this paper