ResearchTrend.AI
  • Papers
  • Communities
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Pricing
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 1411.0948
38
11
v1v2 (latest)

On the push&pull protocol for rumour spreading

4 November 2014
Hüseyin Acan
A. Collevecchio
Abbas Mehrabian
N. Wormald
ArXiv (abs)PDFHTML
Abstract

The asynchronous push&pull protocol, a randomized distributed algorithm for spreading a rumour in a graph GGG, works as follows. Independent Poisson clocks of rate 1 are associated with the vertices of GGG. Initially, one vertex of GGG knows the rumour. Whenever the clock of a vertex xxx rings, it calls a random neighbour yyy: if xxx knows the rumour and yyy does not, then xxx tells yyy the rumour (a push operation), and if xxx does not know the rumour and yyy knows it, yyy tells xxx the rumour (a pull operation). The average spread time of GGG is the expected time it takes for all vertices to know the rumour, and the guaranteed spread time of GGG is the smallest time ttt such that with probability at least 1−1/n1-1/n1−1/n, after time ttt all vertices know the rumour. The synchronous variant of this protocol, in which each clock rings precisely at times 1,2,…1,2,\dots1,2,…, has been studied extensively. We prove the following results for any nnn-vertex graph: In either version, the average spread time is at most linear even if only the pull operation is used, and the guaranteed spread time is within a logarithmic factor of the average spread time, so it is O(nlog⁡n)O(n\log n)O(nlogn). In the asynchronous version, both the average and guaranteed spread times are Ω(log⁡n)\Omega(\log n)Ω(logn). We give examples of graphs illustrating that these bounds are best possible up to constant factors. We also prove theoretical relationships between the guaranteed spread times in the two versions. Firstly, in all graphs the guaranteed spread time in the asynchronous version is within an O(log⁡n)O(\log n)O(logn) factor of that in the synchronous version, and this is tight. Next, we find examples of graphs whose asynchronous spread times are logarithmic, but the synchronous versions are polynomially large. Finally, we show for any graph that the ratio of the synchronous spread time to the asynchronous spread time is O(n2/3)O(n^{2/3})O(n2/3).

View on arXiv
Comments on this paper