431

The SP theory of intelligence: distinctive features and advantages

IEEE Access (IEEE Access), 2015
Abstract

This paper aims to highlight distinctive features of the "SP theory of intelligence" and its apparent advantages compared with some AI-related alternatives. In summary, distinctive features and advantages are: simplification and integration of observations and concepts; simplification and integration of structures and processes in computing systems; the theory is itself a theory of computing; the fundamental roles of information compression via the matching and unification of patterns and multiple alignment; transparency in the representation and processing of knowledge; the discovery of `natural' structures via information compression (DONSVIC); interpretations of mathematics; interpretations in human perception and cognition; and realisation of abstract concepts in terms of neurons and their inter-connections ("SP-neural"). These things are discussed in relation to AI-related alternatives: the concept of minimum length encoding and related concepts; deep learning in neural networks; unified theories of cognition and related research; universal search; Bayesian networks and some other models for AI; pattern recognition and vision; the analysis, production, and translation of natural language; Unsupervised learning of natural language; exact and inexact forms of reasoning; representation and processing of diverse forms of knowledge; IBM's Watson; software engineering; solving problems associated with big data, and in the development of intelligence in autonomous robots. In conclusion, the SP system can provide a firm foundation for the long-term development of AI, with many potential benefits and applications. It may also deliver useful results on relatively short timescales. A high-parallel, open-source version of the SP machine, derived from the SP computer model, would be a means for researchers everywhere to explore what can be done with the system, and to create new versions of it.

View on arXiv
Comments on this paper