ResearchTrend.AI
  • Papers
  • Communities
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Pricing
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 1604.08943
40
16
v1v2 (latest)

Minimax optimal convex methods for Poisson inverse problems under ℓq\ell_qℓq​-ball sparsity

29 April 2016
Yuan Li
Garvesh Raskutti
ArXiv (abs)PDFHTML
Abstract

In this paper, we study the minimax rates and provide a convex implementable algorithm for Poisson inverse problems under weak sparsity and physical constraints. In particular we assume the model yi∼\mboxPoisson(Tai⊤f∗)y_i \sim \mbox{Poisson}(Ta_i^{\top}f^*)yi​∼\mboxPoisson(Tai⊤​f∗) for 1≤i≤n1 \leq i \leq n1≤i≤n where T∈R+T \in \mathbb{R}_+T∈R+​ is the intensity, and we impose weak sparsity on f∗∈Rpf^* \in \mathbb{R}^pf∗∈Rp by assuming f∗f^*f∗ lies in an ℓq\ell_qℓq​-ball when rotated according to an orthonormal basis D∈Rp×pD \in \mathbb{R}^{p \times p}D∈Rp×p. In addition, since we are modeling real physical systems we also impose positivity and flux-preserving constraints on the matrix A=[a1,a2,...,an]⊤A = [a_1, a_2,...,a_n]^{\top}A=[a1​,a2​,...,an​]⊤ and the function f∗f^*f∗. We prove minimax lower bounds for this model which scale as Rq(log⁡pT)1−q/2R_q (\frac{\log p}{T})^{1 - q/2}Rq​(Tlogp​)1−q/2 where it is noticeable that the rate depends on the intensity TTT and not the sample size nnn. We also show that a convex ℓ1\ell_1ℓ1​-based regularized least-squares estimator achieves this minimax lower bound up to a log⁡n\log nlogn factor, provided a suitable restricted eigenvalue condition is satisfied. Finally we prove that provided nnn is sufficiently large, our restricted eigenvalue condition and physical constraints are satisfied for random bounded ensembles. Our results address a number of open issues from prior work on Poisson inverse problems that focusses on strictly sparse models and does not provide guarantees for convex implementable algorithms.

View on arXiv
Comments on this paper