17
117

Fundamental Limits of Weak Recovery with Applications to Phase Retrieval

Abstract

In phase retrieval we want to recover an unknown signal xCd\boldsymbol x\in\mathbb C^d from nn quadratic measurements of the form yi=ai,x2+wiy_i = |\langle{\boldsymbol a}_i,{\boldsymbol x}\rangle|^2+w_i where aiCd\boldsymbol a_i\in \mathbb C^d are known sensing vectors and wiw_i is measurement noise. We ask the following weak recovery question: what is the minimum number of measurements nn needed to produce an estimator x^(y)\hat{\boldsymbol x}(\boldsymbol y) that is positively correlated with the signal x\boldsymbol x? We consider the case of Gaussian vectors ai\boldsymbol a_i. We prove that - in the high-dimensional limit - a sharp phase transition takes place, and we locate the threshold in the regime of vanishingly small noise. For ndo(d)n\le d-o(d) no estimator can do significantly better than random and achieve a strictly positive correlation. For nd+o(d)n\ge d+o(d) a simple spectral estimator achieves a positive correlation. Surprisingly, numerical simulations with the same spectral estimator demonstrate promising performance with realistic sensing matrices. Spectral methods are used to initialize non-convex optimization algorithms in phase retrieval, and our approach can boost the performance in this setting as well. Our impossibility result is based on classical information-theory arguments. The spectral algorithm computes the leading eigenvector of a weighted empirical covariance matrix. We obtain a sharp characterization of the spectral properties of this random matrix using tools from free probability and generalizing a recent result by Lu and Li. Both the upper and lower bound generalize beyond phase retrieval to measurements yiy_i produced according to a generalized linear model. As a byproduct of our analysis, we compare the threshold of the proposed spectral method with that of a message passing algorithm.

View on arXiv
Comments on this paper