ResearchTrend.AI
  • Papers
  • Communities
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Pricing
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 1711.11560
40
55

Testing Conditional Independence of Discrete Distributions

30 November 2017
C. Canonne
Ilias Diakonikolas
D. Kane
Alistair Stewart
ArXivPDFHTML
Abstract

We study the problem of testing \emph{conditional independence} for discrete distributions. Specifically, given samples from a discrete random variable (X,Y,Z)(X, Y, Z)(X,Y,Z) on domain [ℓ1]×[ℓ2]×[n][\ell_1]\times[\ell_2] \times [n][ℓ1​]×[ℓ2​]×[n], we want to distinguish, with probability at least 2/32/32/3, between the case that XXX and YYY are conditionally independent given ZZZ from the case that (X,Y,Z)(X, Y, Z)(X,Y,Z) is ϵ\epsilonϵ-far, in ℓ1\ell_1ℓ1​-distance, from every distribution that has this property. Conditional independence is a concept of central importance in probability and statistics with a range of applications in various scientific domains. As such, the statistical task of testing conditional independence has been extensively studied in various forms within the statistics and econometrics communities for nearly a century. Perhaps surprisingly, this problem has not been previously considered in the framework of distribution property testing and in particular no tester with sublinear sample complexity is known, even for the important special case that the domains of XXX and YYY are binary. The main algorithmic result of this work is the first conditional independence tester with {\em sublinear} sample complexity for discrete distributions over [ℓ1]×[ℓ2]×[n][\ell_1]\times[\ell_2] \times [n][ℓ1​]×[ℓ2​]×[n]. To complement our upper bounds, we prove information-theoretic lower bounds establishing that the sample complexity of our algorithm is optimal, up to constant factors, for a number of settings. Specifically, for the prototypical setting when ℓ1,ℓ2=O(1)\ell_1, \ell_2 = O(1)ℓ1​,ℓ2​=O(1), we show that the sample complexity of testing conditional independence (upper bound and matching lower bound) is \[ \Theta\left({\max\left(n^{1/2}/\epsilon^2,\min\left(n^{7/8}/\epsilon,n^{6/7}/\epsilon^{8/7}\right)\right)}\right)\,. \]

View on arXiv
Comments on this paper