349

Connectivity in Random Annulus Graphs and the Geometric Block Model

Abstract

Random geometric graphs are the simplest, and perhaps the earliest possible random graph model of spatial networks, introduced by Gilbert in 1961. In the most basic setting, a random geometric graph G(n,r)G(n,r) has nn vertices. Each vertex of the graph is assigned a real number in [0,1][0,1] randomly and uniformly. There is an edge between two vertices if the corresponding two random numbers differ by at most rr (to mitigate the boundary effect, let us consider the Lee distance here, dL(u,v)=min{uv,1uv}d_L(u,v) = \min\{|u-v|, 1-|u-v|\}). It is well-known that the connectivity threshold regime for random geometric graphs is at rlognnr \approx \frac{\log n}{n}. In particular, if r=alognnr = \frac{a\log n}{n}, then a random geometric graph is connected with high probability if and only if a>1a > 1. Consider G(n,(1+ϵ)lognn)G(n,\frac{(1+\epsilon)\log{n}}{n}) for any ϵ>0\epsilon >0 to satisfy the connectivity requirement and delete half of its edges which have distance at most logn2n\frac{\log{n}}{2n}. It is natural to believe that the resultant graph will be disconnected. Surprisingly, we show that the graph still remains connected! Formally, generalizing random geometric graphs, we define a random annulus graph G(n,[r1,r2]),r1<r2G(n, [r_1, r_2]), r_1 <r_2 with nn vertices. Each vertex of the graph is assigned a real number in [0,1][0,1] randomly and uniformly as before. There is an edge between two vertices if the Lee distance between the corresponding two random numbers is between r1r_1 and r2r_2, 0<r1<r20<r_1<r_2. Let us assume r1=blognn,r_1 = \frac{b \log n}{n}, and r2=alognn,0<b<ar_2 = \frac{a \log n}{n}, 0 <b <a. We show that this graph is connected with high probability if and only if ab>12a -b > \frac12 and a>1a >1. That is G(n,[0,0.99lognn])G(n, [0,\frac{0.99\log n}{n}]) is not connected but G(n,[0.50lognn,1+ϵlognn])G(n,[\frac{0.50 \log n}{n},\frac{1+\epsilon \log n}{n}]) is. This result is then used to give improved lower and upper bounds on the recovery threshold of the geometric block model.

View on arXiv
Comments on this paper