ResearchTrend.AI
  • Papers
  • Communities
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Pricing
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 1901.10593
11
16

Decentralized Online Learning: Take Benefits from Others' Data without Sharing Your Own to Track Global Trend

29 January 2019
Wendi Wu
Zongren Li
Yawei Zhao
Chenkai Yu
P. Zhao
Ji Liu
    FedML
ArXivPDFHTML
Abstract

Decentralized Online Learning (online learning in decentralized networks) attracts more and more attention, since it is believed that Decentralized Online Learning can help the data providers cooperatively better solve their online problems without sharing their private data to a third party or other providers. Typically, the cooperation is achieved by letting the data providers exchange their models between neighbors, e.g., recommendation model. However, the best regret bound for a decentralized online learning algorithm is \OcalnT\Ocal{n\sqrt{T}}\OcalnT​, where nnn is the number of nodes (or users) and TTT is the number of iterations. This is clearly insignificant since this bound can be achieved \emph{without} any communication in the networks. This reminds us to ask a fundamental question: \emph{Can people really get benefit from the decentralized online learning by exchanging information?} In this paper, we studied when and why the communication can help the decentralized online learning to reduce the regret. Specifically, each loss function is characterized by two components: the adversarial component and the stochastic component. Under this characterization, we show that decentralized online gradient (DOG) enjoys a regret bound \OcalnTG+nTσ\Ocal{n\sqrt{T}G + \sqrt{nT}\sigma}\OcalnT​G+nT​σ, where GGG measures the magnitude of the adversarial component in the private data (or equivalently the local loss function) and σ\sigmaσ measures the randomness within the private data. This regret suggests that people can get benefits from the randomness in the private data by exchanging private information. Another important contribution of this paper is to consider the dynamic regret -- a more practical regret to track users' interest dynamics. Empirical studies are also conducted to validate our analysis.

View on arXiv
Comments on this paper