ResearchTrend.AI
  • Papers
  • Communities
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Pricing
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 1911.01452
93
24
v1v2v3 (latest)

Pan-Private Uniformity Testing

4 November 2019
Kareem Amin
Matthew Joseph
Jieming Mao
ArXiv (abs)PDFHTML
Abstract

A centrally differentially private algorithm maps raw data to differentially private outputs. In contrast, a locally differentially private algorithm may only access data through public interaction with data holders, and this interaction must be a differentially private function of the data. We study the intermediate model of pan-privacy. Unlike a locally private algorithm, a pan-private algorithm receives data in the clear. Unlike a centrally private algorithm, the algorithm receives data one element at a time and must maintain a differentially private internal state while processing this stream. First, we show that pure pan-privacy against multiple intrusions on the internal state is equivalent to sequentially interactive local privacy. Next, we contextualize pan-privacy against a single intrusion by analyzing the sample complexity of uniformity testing over domain [k][k][k]. Focusing on the dependence on kkk, centrally private uniformity testing has sample complexity Θ(k)\Theta(\sqrt{k})Θ(k​), while noninteractive locally private uniformity testing has sample complexity Θ(k)\Theta(k)Θ(k). We show that the sample complexity of pure pan-private uniformity testing is Θ(k2/3)\Theta(k^{2/3})Θ(k2/3). By a new Ω(k)\Omega(k)Ω(k) lower bound for the sequentially interactive setting, we also separate pan-private from sequentially interactive locally private and multi-intrusion pan-private uniformity testing.

View on arXiv
Comments on this paper