It's easy to fool yourself: Case studies on identifying bias and confounding in bio-medical datasets
Subhashini Venugopalan
Arunachalam Narayanaswamy
Samuel J. Yang
Anton Gerashcenko
S. Lipnick
N. Makhortova
James Hawrot
Christine Marques
Joao Pereira
Michael P. Brenner
Lee L. Rubin
Brian Wainger
Marc Berndl

Abstract
Confounding variables are a well known source of nuisance in biomedical studies. They present an even greater challenge when we combine them with black-box machine learning techniques that operate on raw data. This work presents two case studies. In one, we discovered biases arising from systematic errors in the data generation process. In the other, we found a spurious source of signal unrelated to the prediction task at hand. In both cases, our prediction models performed well but under careful examination hidden confounders and biases were revealed. These are cautionary tales on the limits of using machine learning techniques on raw data from scientific experiments.
View on arXivComments on this paper