ResearchTrend.AI
  • Papers
  • Communities
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Pricing
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 2002.04783
147
53
v1v2v3v4v5v6v7v8v9v10v11 (latest)

Revisiting Fixed Support Wasserstein Barycenter: Computational Hardness and Efficient Algorithms

12 February 2020
Tianyi Lin
Nhat Ho
Xi Chen
Marco Cuturi
Michael I. Jordan
ArXiv (abs)PDFHTML
Abstract

We study the fixed-support Wasserstein barycenter problem (FS-WBP), which consists in computing the Wasserstein barycenter of mmm discrete probability measures supported on a finite metric space of size nnn. We show first that the constraint matrix arising from the linear programming (LP) representation of the FS-WBP is totally unimodular when m≥3m \geq 3m≥3 and n=2n = 2n=2, but not totally unimodular when m≥3m \geq 3m≥3 and n≥3n \geq 3n≥3. This result answers an open problem, since it shows that the FS-WBP is not a minimum-cost flow problem and therefore cannot be solved efficiently using linear programming. Building on this negative result, we propose and analyze a simple and efficient variant of the iterative Bregman projection (IBP) algorithm, currently the most widely adopted algorithm to solve the FS-WBP. The algorithm is an accelerated IBP algorithm which achieves the complexity bound of O~(mn7/3/ε)\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(mn^{7/3}/\varepsilon)O(mn7/3/ε). This bound is better than that obtained for the standard IBP algorithm---O~(mn2/ε2)\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(mn^{2}/\varepsilon^2)O(mn2/ε2)---in terms of ε\varepsilonε, and that of accelerated primal-dual gradient algorithm---O~(mn5/2/ε)\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(mn^{5/2}/\varepsilon)O(mn5/2/ε)---in terms of nnn. Empirical studies on simulated datasets demonstrate that the acceleration promised by the theory is real in practice.

View on arXiv
Comments on this paper