ResearchTrend.AI
  • Papers
  • Communities
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Pricing
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 2002.06005
55
4
v1v2v3v4 (latest)

A Breezing Proof of the KMW Bound

14 February 2020
Corinna Coupette
Christoph Lenzen
ArXiv (abs)PDFHTML
Abstract

In their seminal paper from 2004, Kuhn, Moscibroda, and Wattenhofer (KMW) proved a hardness result for several fundamental graph problems in the LOCAL model: For any (randomized) algorithm, there are input graphs with nnn nodes and maximum degree Δ\DeltaΔ on which Ω(min⁡{log⁡n/log⁡log⁡n,log⁡Δ/log⁡log⁡Δ})\Omega(\min\{\sqrt{\log n/\log \log n},\log \Delta/\log \log \Delta\})Ω(min{logn/loglogn​,logΔ/loglogΔ}) (expected) communication rounds are required to obtain polylogarithmic approximations to a minimum vertex cover, minimum dominating set, or maximum matching. Via reduction, this hardness extends to symmetry breaking tasks like finding maximal independent sets or maximal matchings. Today, more than 151515 years later, there is still no proof of this result that is easy on the reader. Setting out to change this, in this work, we provide a fully self-contained and simple\mathit{simple}simple proof of the KMW lower bound. The key argument is algorithmic, and it relies on an invariant that can be readily verified from the generation rules of the lower bound graphs.

View on arXiv
Comments on this paper