266

Parallel Clique Counting and Peeling Algorithms

Conference on Applied and Computational Discrete Algorithms (ACDA), 2020
Abstract

Dense subgraphs capture strong communities in social networks and entities possessing strong interactions in biological networks. In particular, kk-clique counting and listing have applications in identifying important actors in a graph. However, finding kk-cliques is computationally expensive, and thus it is important to have fast parallel algorithms. We present a new parallel algorithm for kk-clique counting that has polylogarithmic span and is work-efficient with respect to the well-known sequential algorithm for kk-clique listing by Chiba and Nishizeki. Our algorithm can be extended to support listing and enumeration, and is based on computing low out-degree orientations. We present a new linear-work and polylogarithmic span algorithm for computing such orientations, and new parallel algorithms for producing unbiased estimations of clique counts. Finally, we design new parallel work-efficient algorithms for approximating the kk-clique densest subgraph. Our first algorithm gives a 1/k1/k-approximation and is based on iteratively peeling vertices with the lowest clique counts; our algorithm is work-efficient, but we prove that this process is P-complete and hence does not have polylogarithmic span. Our second algorithm gives a 1/(k(1+ϵ))1/(k(1+\epsilon))-approximation, is work-efficient, and has polylogarithmic span. In addition, we implement these algorithms and propose optimizations. On a 60-core machine, we achieve 13.23-38.99x and 1.19-13.76x self-relative parallel speedup for kk-clique counting and kk-clique densest subgraph, respectively. Compared to the state-of-the-art parallel kk-clique counting algorithms, we achieve a 1.31-9.88x speedup, and compared to existing implementations of kk-clique densest subgraph, we achieve a 1.01-11.83x speedup. We are able to compute the 44-clique counts on the largest publicly-available graph with over two hundred billion edges.

View on arXiv
Comments on this paper