ResearchTrend.AI
  • Papers
  • Communities
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Pricing
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 2003.07427
91
6
v1v2 (latest)

Beyond Alice and Bob: Improved Inapproximability for Maximum Independent Set in CONGEST

16 March 2020
Yuval Efron
O. Grossman
Seri Khoury
ArXiv (abs)PDFHTML
Abstract

By far the most fruitful technique for showing lower bounds for the CONGEST model is reductions to two-party communication complexity. This technique has yielded nearly tight results for various fundamental problems such as distance computations, minimum spanning tree, minimum vertex cover, and more. In this work, we take this technique a step further, and we introduce a framework of reductions to ttt-party communication complexity, for every t≥2t\geq 2t≥2. Our framework enables us to show improved hardness results for maximum independent set. Recently, Bachrach et al.[PODC 2019] used the two-party framework to show hardness of approximation for maximum independent set. They show that finding a (5/6+ϵ)(5/6+\epsilon)(5/6+ϵ)-approximation requires Ω(n/log⁡6n)\Omega(n/\log^6 n)Ω(n/log6n) rounds, and finding a (7/8+ϵ)(7/8+\epsilon)(7/8+ϵ)-approximation requires Ω(n2/log⁡7n)\Omega(n^2/\log^7 n)Ω(n2/log7n) rounds, in the CONGEST model where nnn in the number of nodes in the network. We improve the results of Bachrach et al. by using reductions to multi-party communication complexity. Our results: (1) Any algorithm that finds a (1/2+ϵ)(1/2+\epsilon)(1/2+ϵ)-approximation for maximum independent set in the CONGEST model requires Ω(n/log⁡3n)\Omega(n/\log^3 n)Ω(n/log3n) rounds. (2) Any algorithm that finds a (3/4+ϵ)(3/4+\epsilon)(3/4+ϵ)-approximation for maximum independent set in the CONGEST model requires Ω(n2/log⁡3n)\Omega(n^2/\log^3 n)Ω(n2/log3n) rounds.

View on arXiv
Comments on this paper