ResearchTrend.AI
  • Papers
  • Communities
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Pricing
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 2106.02440
29
18

Improved Distributed Lower Bounds for MIS and Bounded (Out-)Degree Dominating Sets in Trees

4 June 2021
Alkida Balliu
S. Brandt
Fabian Kuhn
Dennis Olivetti
ArXiv (abs)PDFHTML
Abstract

Recently, Balliu, Brandt, and Olivetti [FOCS '20] showed the first ω(log⁡∗n)\omega(\log^* n)ω(log∗n) lower bound for the maximal independent set (MIS) problem in trees. In this work we prove lower bounds for a much more relaxed family of distributed symmetry breaking problems. As a by-product, we obtain improved lower bounds for the distributed MIS problem in trees. For a parameter kkk and an orientation of the edges of a graph GGG, we say that a subset SSS of the nodes of GGG is a kkk-outdegree dominating set if SSS is a dominating set of GGG and if in the induced subgraph G[S]G[S]G[S], every node in SSS has outdegree at most kkk. Note that for k=0k=0k=0, this definition coincides with the definition of an MIS. For a given kkk, we consider the problem of computing a kkk-outdegree dominating set. We show that, even in regular trees of degree at most Δ\DeltaΔ, in the standard \LOCAL model, there exists a constant ϵ>0\epsilon>0ϵ>0 such that for k≤Δϵk\leq \Delta^\epsilonk≤Δϵ, for the problem of computing a kkk-outdegree dominating set, any randomized algorithm requires at least Ω(min⁡{log⁡Δ,log⁡log⁡n})\Omega(\min\{\log\Delta,\sqrt{\log\log n}\})Ω(min{logΔ,loglogn​}) rounds and any deterministic algorithm requires at least Ω(min⁡{log⁡Δ,log⁡n})\Omega(\min\{\log\Delta,\sqrt{\log n}\})Ω(min{logΔ,logn​}) rounds. The proof of our lower bounds is based on the recently highly successful round elimination technique. We provide a novel way to do simplifications for round elimination, which we expect to be of independent interest. Our new proof is considerably simpler than the lower bound proof in [FOCS '20]. In particular, our round elimination proof uses a family of problems that can be described by only a constant number of labels. The existence of such a proof for the MIS problem was believed impossible by the authors of [FOCS '20].

View on arXiv
Comments on this paper