ResearchTrend.AI
  • Papers
  • Communities
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Pricing
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 2110.00643
70
29
v1v2v3 (latest)

Distributed ΔΔΔ-Coloring Plays Hide-and-Seek

1 October 2021
Alkida Balliu
S. Brandt
Fabian Kuhn
Dennis Olivetti
ArXiv (abs)PDFHTML
Abstract

We prove several new tight distributed lower bounds for classic symmetry breaking graph problems. As a basic tool, we first provide a new insightful proof that any deterministic distributed algorithm that computes a Δ\DeltaΔ-coloring on Δ\DeltaΔ-regular trees requires Ω(log⁡Δn)\Omega(\log_\Delta n)Ω(logΔ​n) rounds and any randomized algorithm requires Ω(log⁡Δlog⁡n)\Omega(\log_\Delta\log n)Ω(logΔ​logn) rounds. We prove this result by showing that a natural relaxation of the Δ\DeltaΔ-coloring problem is a fixed point in the round elimination framework. As a first application, we show that our Δ\DeltaΔ-coloring lower bound proof directly extends to arbdefective colorings. We exactly characterize which variants of the arbdefective coloring problem are "easy", and which of them instead are "hard". As a second application, which we see as our main contribution, we use the structure of the fixed point as a building block to prove lower bounds as a function of Δ\DeltaΔ for a large class of distributed symmetry breaking problems. For example, we obtain a tight lower bound for the fundamental problem of computing a (2,β)(2,\beta)(2,β)-ruling set. This is an exponential improvement over the best existing lower bound for the problem, which was proven in [FOCS '20]. Our lower bound even applies to a much more general family of problems that allows for almost arbitrary combinations of natural constraints from coloring problems, orientation problems, and independent set problems, and provides a single unified proof for known and new lower bound results for these types of problems. Our lower bounds as a function of Δ\DeltaΔ also imply lower bounds as a function of nnn. We obtain, for example, that maximal independent set, on trees, requires Ω(log⁡n/log⁡log⁡n)\Omega(\log n / \log \log n)Ω(logn/loglogn) rounds for deterministic algorithms, which is tight.

View on arXiv
Comments on this paper