11
12

DeepLSS: breaking parameter degeneracies in large scale structure with deep learning analysis of combined probes

Abstract

In classical cosmological analysis of large scale structure surveys with 2-pt functions, the parameter measurement precision is limited by several key degeneracies within the cosmology and astrophysics sectors. For cosmic shear, clustering amplitude σ8\sigma_8 and matter density Ωm\Omega_m roughly follow the S8=σ8(Ωm/0.3)0.5S_8=\sigma_8(\Omega_m/0.3)^{0.5} relation. In turn, S8S_8 is highly correlated with the intrinsic galaxy alignment amplitude AIAA_{\rm{IA}}. For galaxy clustering, the bias bgb_g is degenerate with both σ8\sigma_8 and Ωm\Omega_m, as well as the stochasticity rgr_g. Moreover, the redshift evolution of IA and bias can cause further parameter confusion. A tomographic 2-pt probe combination can partially lift these degeneracies. In this work we demonstrate that a deep learning analysis of combined probes of weak gravitational lensing and galaxy clustering, which we call DeepLSS, can effectively break these degeneracies and yield significantly more precise constraints on σ8\sigma_8, Ωm\Omega_m, AIAA_{\rm{IA}}, bgb_g, rgr_g, and IA redshift evolution parameter ηIA\eta_{\rm{IA}}. The most significant gains are in the IA sector: the precision of AIAA_{\rm{IA}} is increased by approximately 8x and is almost perfectly decorrelated from S8S_8. Galaxy bias bgb_g is improved by 1.5x, stochasticity rgr_g by 3x, and the redshift evolution ηIA\eta_{\rm{IA}} and ηb\eta_b by 1.6x. Breaking these degeneracies leads to a significant gain in constraining power for σ8\sigma_8 and Ωm\Omega_m, with the figure of merit improved by 15x. We give an intuitive explanation for the origin of this information gain using sensitivity maps. These results indicate that the fully numerical, map-based forward modeling approach to cosmological inference with machine learning may play an important role in upcoming LSS surveys. We discuss perspectives and challenges in its practical deployment for a full survey analysis.

View on arXiv
Comments on this paper