ResearchTrend.AI
  • Communities
  • Connect sessions
  • AI calendar
  • Organizations
  • Join Slack
  • Contact Sales
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Contact Sales
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 2205.02043
134
8
v1v2 (latest)

A Manifold Two-Sample Test Study: Integral Probability Metric with Neural Networks

Information and Inference A Journal of the IMA (JIII), 2022
4 May 2022
Jie Wang
Minshuo Chen
Tuo Zhao
Wenjing Liao
Yao Xie
ArXiv (abs)PDFHTML
Abstract

Two-sample tests are important areas aiming to determine whether two collections of observations follow the same distribution or not. We propose two-sample tests based on integral probability metric (IPM) for high-dimensional samples supported on a low-dimensional manifold. We characterize the properties of proposed tests with respect to the number of samples nnn and the structure of the manifold with intrinsic dimension ddd. When an atlas is given, we propose two-step test to identify the difference between general distributions, which achieves the type-II risk in the order of n−1/max⁡{d,2}n^{-1/\max\{d,2\}}n−1/max{d,2}. When an atlas is not given, we propose H\"older IPM test that applies for data distributions with (s,β)(s,\beta)(s,β)-H\"older densities, which achieves the type-II risk in the order of n−(s+β)/dn^{-(s+\beta)/d}n−(s+β)/d. To mitigate the heavy computation burden of evaluating the H\"older IPM, we approximate the H\"older function class using neural networks. Based on the approximation theory of neural networks, we show that the neural network IPM test has the type-II risk in the order of n−(s+β)/dn^{-(s+\beta)/d}n−(s+β)/d, which is in the same order of the type-II risk as the H\"older IPM test. Our proposed tests are adaptive to low-dimensional geometric structure because their performance crucially depends on the intrinsic dimension instead of the data dimension.

View on arXiv
Comments on this paper