ResearchTrend.AI
  • Papers
  • Communities
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Pricing
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 2205.07777
75
10

Unlabeled Multi-Robot Motion Planning with Tighter Separation Bounds

16 May 2022
Bahareh Banyassady
Mark de Berg
K. Bringmann
K. Buchin
Henning Fernau
Dan Halperin
Irina Kostitsyna
Y. Okamoto
Stijn Slot
ArXiv (abs)PDFHTML
Abstract

We consider the unlabeled motion-planning problem of mmm unit-disc robots moving in a simple polygonal workspace of nnn edges. The goal is to find a motion plan that moves the robots to a given set of mmm target positions. For the unlabeled variant, it does not matter which robot reaches which target position as long as all target positions are occupied in the end. If the workspace has narrow passages such that the robots cannot fit through them, then the free configuration space, representing all possible unobstructed positions of the robots, will consist of multiple connected components. Even if in each component of the free space the number of targets matches the number of start positions, the motion-planning problem does not always have a solution when the robots and their targets are positioned very densely. In this paper, we prove tight bounds on how much separation between start and target positions is necessary to always guarantee a solution. Moreover, we describe an algorithm that always finds a solution in time O(nlog⁡n+mn+m2)O(n \log n + mn + m^2)O(nlogn+mn+m2) if the separation bounds are met. Specifically, we prove that the following separation is sufficient: any two start positions are at least distance 444 apart, any two target positions are at least distance 444 apart, and any pair of a start and a target positions is at least distance 333 apart. We further show that when the free space consists of a single connected component, the separation between start and target positions is not necessary.

View on arXiv
Comments on this paper