ResearchTrend.AI
  • Papers
  • Communities
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Pricing
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 2302.06878
50
11

Distributed Symmetry Breaking on Power Graphs via Sparsification

14 February 2023
Yannic Maus
Saku Peltonen
Jara Uitto
ArXiv (abs)PDFHTML
Abstract

In this paper, we present efficient distributed algorithms for classical symmetry breaking problems, maximal independent sets (MIS) and ruling sets, in power graphs. We work in the standard CONGEST model of distributed message passing, where the communication network is abstracted as a graph GGG. Typically, the problem instance in CONGEST is identical to the communication network GGG, that is, we perform the symmetry breaking in GGG. In this work, we consider a setting where the problem instance corresponds to a power graph GkG^kGk, where each node of the communication network GGG is connected to all of its kkk-hop neighbors. Our main contribution is a deterministic polylogarithmic time algorithm for computing kkk-ruling sets of GkG^kGk, which (for k>1k>1k>1) improves exponentially on the current state-of-the-art runtimes. The main technical ingredient for this result is a deterministic sparsification procedure which may be of independent interest. On top of being a natural family of problems, ruling sets (in power graphs) are well-motivated through their applications in the powerful shattering framework [BEPS JACM'16, Ghaffari SODA'19] (and others). We present randomized algorithms for computing maximal independent sets and ruling sets of GkG^kGk in essentially the same time as they can be computed in GGG. We also revisit the shattering algorithm for MIS [BEPS JACM'16] and present different approaches for the post-shattering phase. Our solutions are algorithmically and analytically simpler (also in the LOCAL model) than existing solutions and obtain the same runtime as [Ghaffari SODA'16].

View on arXiv
Comments on this paper