ResearchTrend.AI
  • Papers
  • Communities
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Pricing
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 2302.13514
13
4

Applications of Federated Learning in Manufacturing: Identifying the Challenges and Exploring the Future Directions with Industry 4.0 and 5.0 Visions

27 February 2023
Farzana Islam
Ahmed Shoyeb Raihan
Imtiaz Ahmed
    FedML
    AI4CE
ArXivPDFHTML
Abstract

In manufacturing settings, data collection and analysis are often a time-consuming, challenging, and costly process. It also hinders the use of advanced machine learning and data-driven methods which require a substantial amount of offline training data to generate good results. It is particularly challenging for small manufacturers who do not share the resources of a large enterprise. Recently, with the introduction of the Internet of Things (IoT), data can be collected in an integrated manner across the factory in real-time, sent to the cloud for advanced analysis, and used to update the machine learning model sequentially. Nevertheless, small manufacturers face two obstacles in reaping the benefits of IoT: they may be unable to afford or generate enough data to operate a private cloud, and they may be hesitant to share their raw data with a public cloud. Federated learning (FL) is an emerging concept of collaborative learning that can help small-scale industries address these issues and learn from each other without sacrificing their privacy. It can bring together diverse and geographically dispersed manufacturers under the same analytics umbrella to create a win-win situation. However, the widespread adoption of FL across multiple manufacturing organizations remains a significant challenge. This study aims to review the challenges and future directions of applying federated learning in the manufacturing industry, with a specific emphasis on the perspectives of Industry 4.0 and 5.0.

View on arXiv
Comments on this paper