ResearchTrend.AI
  • Papers
  • Communities
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Pricing
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 2305.18033
27
13

The ACROBAT 2022 Challenge: Automatic Registration Of Breast Cancer Tissue

29 May 2023
Philippe Weitz
Masi Valkonen
Leslie Solorzano
Circe Carr
K. Kartasalo
Constance Boissin
Sonja Koivukoski
Aino Kuusela
Dusan Rasic
Yanbo Feng
S. Pouplier
Abhinav Sharma
Kajsa Ledesma Eriksson
S. Robertson
Christian Marzahl
Chandler D. Gatenbee
Alexander R. A. Anderson
Marek Wodzinski
Artur Jurgas
Niccolo Marini
M. Atzori
Henning Muller
Daniel Budelmann
Nick Weiss
Stefan Heldmann
J. Lotz
J. Wolterink
B. D. Santi
Abhijeet Patil
Amit Sethi
Satoshi Kondo
Satoshi Kasai
Kousuke Hirasawa
Mahtab Farrokh
Neeraj Kumar
Russell Greiner
Leena Latonen
A. Laenkholm
Johan Hartman
Pekka Ruusuvuori
M. Rantalainen
    OOD
ArXivPDFHTML
Abstract

The alignment of tissue between histopathological whole-slide-images (WSI) is crucial for research and clinical applications. Advances in computing, deep learning, and availability of large WSI datasets have revolutionised WSI analysis. Therefore, the current state-of-the-art in WSI registration is unclear. To address this, we conducted the ACROBAT challenge, based on the largest WSI registration dataset to date, including 4,212 WSIs from 1,152 breast cancer patients. The challenge objective was to align WSIs of tissue that was stained with routine diagnostic immunohistochemistry to its H&E-stained counterpart. We compare the performance of eight WSI registration algorithms, including an investigation of the impact of different WSI properties and clinical covariates. We find that conceptually distinct WSI registration methods can lead to highly accurate registration performances and identify covariates that impact performances across methods. These results establish the current state-of-the-art in WSI registration and guide researchers in selecting and developing methods.

View on arXiv
Comments on this paper