Inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) algorithms often rely on (forward) reinforcement learning or planning, over a given time horizon, to compute an approximately optimal policy for a hypothesized reward function; they then match this policy with expert demonstrations. The time horizon plays a critical role in determining both the accuracy of reward estimates and the computational efficiency of IRL algorithms. Interestingly, an *effective time horizon* shorter than the ground-truth value often produces better results faster. This work formally analyzes this phenomenon and provides an explanation: the time horizon controls the complexity of an induced policy class and mitigates overfitting with limited data. This analysis provides a guide for the principled choice of the effective horizon for IRL. It also prompts us to re-examine the classic IRL formulation: it is more natural to learn jointly the reward and the effective horizon rather than the reward alone with a given horizon. To validate our findings, we implement a cross-validation extension and the experimental results support the theoretical analysis. The project page and code are publicly available.
View on arXiv@article{xu2025_2307.06541,
title={ On the Effective Horizon of Inverse Reinforcement Learning },
author={ Yiqing Xu and Finale Doshi-Velez and David Hsu },
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.06541},
year={ 2025 }
}