Confidence Matters: Revisiting Intrinsic Self-Correction Capabilities of Large Language Models

The recent success of Large Language Models (LLMs) has catalyzed an increasing interest in their self-correction capabilities. This paper presents a comprehensive investigation into the intrinsic self-correction of LLMs, attempting to address the ongoing debate about its feasibility. Our research has identified an important latent factor - the ``confidence'' of LLMs - during the self-correction process. Overlooking this factor may cause the models to over-criticize themselves, resulting in unreliable conclusions regarding the efficacy of self-correction. We have experimentally observed that LLMs possess the capability to understand the ``confidence'' in their own responses. It motivates us to develop an ``If-or-Else'' (IoE) prompting framework, designed to guide LLMs in assessing their own ``confidence'', facilitating intrinsic self-corrections. We conduct extensive experiments and demonstrate that our IoE-based Prompt can achieve a consistent improvement regarding the accuracy of self-corrected responses over the initial answers. Our study not only sheds light on the underlying factors affecting self-correction in LLMs, but also introduces a practical framework that utilizes the IoE prompting principle to efficiently improve self-correction capabilities with ``confidence''. The code is available at \url{https://github.com/MBZUAI-CLeaR/IoE-Prompting.git}.