In recent years, we have witnessed the emergence of scientific machine learning as a data-driven tool for the analysis, by means of deep-learning techniques, of data produced by computational science and engineering applications. At the core of these methods is the supervised training algorithm to learn the neural network realization, a highly non-convex optimization problem that is usually solved using stochastic gradient methods. However, distinct from deep-learning practice, scientific machine-learning training problems feature a much larger volume of smooth data and better characterizations of the empirical risk functions, which make them suited for conventional solvers for unconstrained optimization. We introduce a lightweight software framework built on top of the Portable and Extensible Toolkit for Scientific computation to bridge the gap between deep-learning software and conventional solvers for unconstrained minimization. We empirically demonstrate the superior efficacy of a trust region method based on the Gauss-Newton approximation of the Hessian in improving the generalization errors arising from regression tasks when learning surrogate models for a wide range of scientific machine-learning techniques and test cases. All the conventional second-order solvers tested, including L-BFGS and inexact Newton with line-search, compare favorably, either in terms of cost or accuracy, with the adaptive first-order methods used to validate the surrogate models.
View on arXiv