Steerable needles are minimally invasive devices that enable novel medical procedures by following curved paths to avoid critical anatomical obstacles. Planning algorithms can be used to find a steerable needle motion plan to a target. Deployment typically consists of a physician manually inserting the steerable needle into tissue at the motion plan's start pose and handing off control to a robot, which then autonomously steers it to the target along the plan. The handoff between human and robot is critical for procedure success, as even small deviations from the start pose change the steerable needle's workspace and there is no guarantee that the target will still be reachable. We introduce a metric that evaluates the robustness to such start pose deviations. When measuring this robustness to deviations, we consider the tradeoff between being robust to changes in position versus changes in orientation. We evaluate our metric through simulation in an abstract, a liver, and a lung planning scenario. Our evaluation shows that our metric can be combined with different motion planners and that it efficiently determines large, safe start regions.
View on arXiv