Insights into Alignment: Evaluating DPO and its Variants Across Multiple Tasks

This study evaluates Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) and its variants for aligning Large Language Models (LLMs) with human preferences, testing three configurations: (1) with Supervised Fine Tuning (SFT), (2) without SFT, and (3) without SFT but using an instruction tuned model. We further investigate how training set size influences model performance. Our evaluation spans 13 benchmarks covering dialogue, reasoning, mathematical problem-solving, question answering, truthfulness, MT-Bench, Big Bench, and the Open LLM Leaderboard. We find that: (1) alignment methods often achieve near optimal performance even with smaller subsets of training data; (2) although they offer limited improvements on complex reasoning tasks, they enhance mathematical problem-solving; and (3) using an instruction tuned model improves truthfulness. These insights highlight the conditions under which alignment methods excel, as well as their limitations.

@article{saeidi2025_2404.14723,
  title={ Insights into Alignment: Evaluating DPO and its Variants Across Multiple Tasks },
  author={ Amir Saeidi and Shivanshu Verma and Md Nayem Uddin and Chitta Baral },
  journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.14723},
  year={ 2025 }
}