ResearchTrend.AI
  • Papers
  • Communities
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Pricing
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 2405.19230
21
3

Valid Conformal Prediction for Dynamic GNNs

29 May 2024
Ed Davis
Ian Gallagher
Daniel J. Lawson
Patrick Rubin-Delanchy
    AI4CE
ArXivPDFHTML
Abstract

Dynamic graphs provide a flexible data abstraction for modelling many sorts of real-world systems, such as transport, trade, and social networks. Graph neural networks (GNNs) are powerful tools allowing for different kinds of prediction and inference on these systems, but getting a handle on uncertainty, especially in dynamic settings, is a challenging problem. In this work we propose to use a dynamic graph representation known in the tensor literature as the unfolding, to achieve valid prediction sets via conformal prediction. This representation, a simple graph, can be input to any standard GNN and does not require any modification to existing GNN architectures or conformal prediction routines. One of our key contributions is a careful mathematical consideration of the different inference scenarios which can arise in a dynamic graph modelling context. For a range of practically relevant cases, we obtain valid prediction sets with almost no assumptions, even dispensing with exchangeability. In a more challenging scenario, which we call the semi-inductive regime, we achieve valid prediction under stronger assumptions, akin to stationarity. We provide real data examples demonstrating validity, showing improved accuracy over baselines, and sign-posting different failure modes which can occur when those assumptions are violated.

View on arXiv
@article{davis2025_2405.19230,
  title={ Valid Conformal Prediction for Dynamic GNNs },
  author={ Ed Davis and Ian Gallagher and Daniel John Lawson and Patrick Rubin-Delanchy },
  journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.19230},
  year={ 2025 }
}
Comments on this paper