The advances of large foundation models necessitate wide-coverage, low-cost, and zero-contamination benchmarks. Despite continuous exploration of language model evaluations, comprehensive studies on the evaluation of Large Multi-modal Models (LMMs) remain limited. In this work, we introduce LMMS-EVAL, a unified and standardized multimodal benchmark framework with over 50 tasks and more than 10 models to promote transparent and reproducible evaluations. Although LMMS-EVAL offers comprehensive coverage, we find it still falls short in achieving low cost and zero contamination. To approach this evaluation trilemma, we further introduce LMMS-EVAL LITE, a pruned evaluation toolkit that emphasizes both coverage and efficiency. Additionally, we present Multimodal LIVEBENCH that utilizes continuously updating news and online forums to assess models' generalization abilities in the wild, featuring a low-cost and zero-contamination evaluation approach. In summary, our work highlights the importance of considering the evaluation trilemma and provides practical solutions to navigate the trade-offs in evaluating large multi-modal models, paving the way for more effective and reliable benchmarking of LMMs. We opensource our codebase and maintain leaderboard of LIVEBENCH atthis https URLandthis https URL.
View on arXiv@article{zhang2025_2407.12772,
title={ LMMs-Eval: Reality Check on the Evaluation of Large Multimodal Models },
author={ Kaichen Zhang and Bo Li and Peiyuan Zhang and Fanyi Pu and Joshua Adrian Cahyono and Kairui Hu and Shuai Liu and Yuanhan Zhang and Jingkang Yang and Chunyuan Li and Ziwei Liu },
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.12772},
year={ 2025 }
}