ResearchTrend.AI
  • Communities
  • Connect sessions
  • AI calendar
  • Organizations
  • Join Slack
  • Contact Sales
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Contact Sales
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2026 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 2408.00465
542
2
v1v2v3v4v5 (latest)

Infrequent Resolving Algorithm for Online Linear Programming

1 August 2024
Guokai Li
Yuan Wang
Mingjie Li
ArXiv (abs)PDFHTML
Abstract

Online linear programming (OLP) has gained significant attention from both researchers and practitioners due to its extensive applications, such as online auction, network revenue management, order fulfillment and advertising. Existing OLP algorithms fall into two categories: LP-based algorithms and LP-free algorithms. The former one typically guarantees better performance, even offering a constant regret, but requires solving a large number of LPs, which could be computationally expensive. In contrast, LP-free algorithm only requires first-order computations but induces a worse performance, lacking a constant regret bound. In this work, we bridge the gap between these two extremes by proposing a well-performing algorithm, that solves LPs at a few selected time points and conducts first-order computations at other time points. Specifically, for the case where the inputs are drawn from an unknown finite-support distribution, the proposed algorithm achieves a constant regret (even for the hard ``degenerate'' case) while solving LPs only O(log⁡log⁡T)\mathcal{O}(\log\log T)O(loglogT) times over the time horizon TTT. Moreover, when we are allowed to solve LPs only MMM times, we design the corresponding schedule such that the proposed algorithm can guarantee a nearly O(T(1/2)M−1)\mathcal{O}\left(T^{(1/2)^{M-1}}\right)O(T(1/2)M−1) regret. Our work highlights the value of resolving both at the beginning and the end of the selling horizon, and provides a novel framework to prove the performance guarantee of the proposed policy under different infrequent resolving schedules. Furthermore, when the arrival probabilities are known at the beginning, our algorithm can guarantee a constant regret by solving LPs O(log⁡log⁡T)\mathcal{O}(\log\log T)O(loglogT) times, and a nearly O(T(1/2)M)\mathcal{O}\left(T^{(1/2)^{M}}\right)O(T(1/2)M) regret by solving LPs only MMM times. Numerical experiments are conducted to demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed algorithms.

View on arXiv
Comments on this paper