ResearchTrend.AI
  • Papers
  • Communities
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Pricing
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 2410.18234
23
2

Multi-Draft Speculative Sampling: Canonical Decomposition and Theoretical Limits

23 October 2024
Ashish Khisti
MohammadReza Ebrahimi
Hassan Dbouk
Arash Behboodi
Roland Memisevic
Christos Louizos
ArXivPDFHTML
Abstract

We consider multi-draft speculative sampling, where the proposal sequences are sampled independently from different draft models. At each step, a token-level draft selection scheme takes a list of valid tokens as input and produces an output token whose distribution matches that of the target model. Previous works have demonstrated that the optimal scheme (which maximizes the probability of accepting one of the input tokens) can be cast as a solution to a linear program. In this work we show that the optimal scheme can be decomposed into a two-step solution: in the first step an importance sampling (IS) type scheme is used to select one intermediate token; in the second step (single-draft) speculative sampling is applied to generate the output token. For the case of two identical draft models we further 1) establish a necessary and sufficient condition on the distributions of the target and draft models for the acceptance probability to equal one and 2) provide an explicit expression for the optimal acceptance probability. Our theoretical analysis also motives a new class of token-level selection schemes based on weighted importance sampling. Our experimental results demonstrate consistent improvements in the achievable block efficiency and token rates over baseline schemes in a number of scenarios.

View on arXiv
@article{khisti2025_2410.18234,
  title={ Multi-Draft Speculative Sampling: Canonical Decomposition and Theoretical Limits },
  author={ Ashish Khisti and M.Reza Ebrahimi and Hassan Dbouk and Arash Behboodi and Roland Memisevic and Christos Louizos },
  journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.18234},
  year={ 2025 }
}
Comments on this paper