20
0

Distributed Complexity of PkP_k-freeness: Decision and Certification

Masayuki Miyamoto
Abstract

The class of graphs that do not contain a path on kk nodes as an induced subgraph (PkP_k-free graphs) has rich applications in the theory of graph algorithms. This paper explores the problem of deciding PkP_k-freeness from the viewpoint of distributed computing. For specific small values of kk, we present the \textit{first} CONGEST\mathsf{CONGEST} algorithms specified for PkP_k-freeness, utilizing structural properties of PkP_k-free graphs in a novel way. Specifically, we show that PkP_k-freeness can be decided in O~(1)\tilde{O}(1) rounds for k=4k=4 in the broadcast  CONGEST\mathsf{broadcast\;CONGEST} model, and in O~(n)\tilde{O}(n) rounds for k=5k=5 in the CONGEST\mathsf{CONGEST} model, where nn is the number of nodes in the network and O~()\tilde{O}(\cdot) hides a polylog(n)\mathrm{polylog}(n) factor. These results significantly improve the previous O(n22/(3k+2))O(n^{2-2/(3k+2)}) upper bounds by Eden et al. (Dist.~Comp.~2022). We also construct a local certification of P5P_5-freeness with certificates of size O~(n)\tilde{O}(n). This is nearly optimal, given our Ω(n1o(1))\Omega(n^{1-o(1)}) lower bound on certificate size, and marks a significant advancement as no nontrivial bounds for proof-labeling schemes of P5P_5-freeness were previously known. For general kk, we establish the first CONGEST\mathsf{CONGEST} lower bound, which is of the form n21/Θ(k)n^{2-1/\Theta(k)}. The n1/Θ(k)n^{1/\Theta(k)} factor is unavoidable, in view of the O(n22/(3k+2))O(n^{2-2/(3k+2)}) upper bound mentioned above. Additionally, our approach yields the \textit{first} superlinear lower bound on certificate size for local certification. This partially answers the conjecture on the optimal certificate size of PkP_k-freeness, asked by Bousquet et al. (arXiv:2402.12148). Finally, we propose a novel variant of the problem called ordered PkP_k detection, and show a linear lower bound and its nontrivial connection to distributed subgraph detection.

View on arXiv
Comments on this paper