72

Conditional regression for the Nonlinear Single-Variable Model

Main:56 Pages
12 Figures
Bibliography:7 Pages
1 Tables
Abstract

Several statistical models for regression of a function FF on Rd\mathbb{R}^d without the statistical and computational curse of dimensionality exist, for example by imposing and exploiting geometric assumptions on the distribution of the data (e.g. that its support is low-dimensional), or strong smoothness assumptions on FF, or a special structure FF. Among the latter, compositional models assume F=fgF=f\circ g with gg mapping to Rr\mathbb{R}^r with rdr\ll d, have been studied, and include classical single- and multi-index models and recent works on neural networks. While the case where gg is linear is rather well-understood, much less is known when gg is nonlinear, and in particular for which gg's the curse of dimensionality in estimating FF, or both ff and gg, may be circumvented. In this paper, we consider a model $F(X):=f(\Pi_\gamma X) $ where Πγ:Rd[0,lenγ]\Pi_\gamma:\mathbb{R}^d\to[0,\rm{len}_\gamma] is the closest-point projection onto the parameter of a regular curve γ:[0,lenγ]Rd\gamma: [0,\rm{len}_\gamma]\to\mathbb{R}^d and f:[0,lenγ]R1f:[0,\rm{len}_\gamma]\to\mathbb{R}^1. The input data XX is not low-dimensional, far from γ\gamma, conditioned on Πγ(X)\Pi_\gamma(X) being well-defined. The distribution of the data, γ\gamma and ff are unknown. This model is a natural nonlinear generalization of the single-index model, which corresponds to γ\gamma being a line. We propose a nonparametric estimator, based on conditional regression, and show that under suitable assumptions, the strongest of which being that ff is coarsely monotone, it can achieve the oneone-dimensionaldimensional optimal min-max rate for non-parametric regression, up to the level of noise in the observations, and be constructed in time O(d2nlogn)\mathcal{O}(d^2n\log n). All the constants in the learning bounds, in the minimal number of samples required for our bounds to hold, and in the computational complexity are at most low-order polynomials in dd.

View on arXiv
Comments on this paper