Equivalence checking, i.e., determining whether two programs produce identical outputs for all possible inputs, underpins a broad range of applications, including software refactoring, testing, and optimization. We present the task of equivalence checking as a new way to evaluate the code reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs). We introduce EquiBench, a dataset of 2400 program pairs spanning four programming languages and six equivalence categories. These pairs are systematically generated through program analysis, compiler scheduling, and superoptimization, covering nontrivial structural transformations that demand deep semantic reasoning beyond simple syntactic variations. Our evaluation of 17 state-of-the-art LLMs shows that OpenAI o3-mini achieves the highest overall accuracy of 78.0%. In the most challenging categories, the best accuracies are 62.3% and 68.8%, only modestly above the 50% random baseline for binary classification, indicating significant room for improvement in current models' code reasoning capabilities.
View on arXiv@article{wei2025_2502.12466,
title={ EquiBench: Benchmarking Code Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models via Equivalence Checking },
author={ Anjiang Wei and Jiannan Cao and Ran Li and Hongyu Chen and Yuhui Zhang and Ziheng Wang and Yaofeng Sun and Yuan Liu and Thiago S. F. X. Teixeira and Diyi Yang and Ke Wang and Alex Aiken },
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.12466},
year={ 2025 }
}