Can LVLMs and Automatic Metrics Capture Underlying Preferences of Blind and Low-Vision Individuals for Navigational Aid?

Vision is a primary means of how humans perceive the environment, but Blind and Low-Vision (BLV) people need assistance understanding their surroundings, especially in unfamiliar environments. The emergence of semantic-based systems as assistance tools for BLV users has motivated many researchers to explore responses from Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs). However, it has yet been studied preferences of BLV users on diverse types/styles of responses from LVLMs, specifically for navigational aid. To fill this gap, we first construct Eye4B dataset, consisting of human-validated 1.1k curated outdoor/indoor scenes with 5-10 relevant requests per scene. Then, we conduct an in-depth user study with eight BLV users to evaluate their preferences on six LVLMs from five perspectives: Afraidness, Nonactionability, Sufficiency, and Conciseness. Finally, we introduce Eye4B benchmark for evaluating alignment between widely used model-based image-text metrics and our collected BLV preferences. Our work can be set as a guideline for developing BLV-aware LVLMs towards a Barrier-Free AI system.

@article{an2025_2502.14883,
  title={ Can LVLMs and Automatic Metrics Capture Underlying Preferences of Blind and Low-Vision Individuals for Navigational Aid? },
  author={ Na Min An and Eunki Kim and Wan Ju Kang and Sangryul Kim and Hyunjung Shim and James Thorne },
  journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.14883},
  year={ 2025 }
}