Modern large language models (LLMs) achieve impressive performance on some tasks, while exhibiting distinctly non-human-like behaviors on others. This raises the question of how well the LLM's learned representations align with human representations. In this work, we introduce a novel approach to the study of representation alignment: we adopt a method from research on activation steering to identify neurons responsible for specific concepts (e.g., 'cat') and then analyze the corresponding activation patterns. Our findings reveal that LLM representations closely align with human representations inferred from behavioral data. Notably, this alignment surpasses that of word embeddings, which have been center stage in prior work on human and model alignment. Additionally, our approach enables a more granular view of how LLMs represent concepts. Specifically, we show that LLMs organize concepts in a way that reflects hierarchical relationships interpretable to humans (e.g., ánimal'-'dog').
View on arXiv@article{fedzechkina2025_2502.15090,
title={ Analyze the Neurons, not the Embeddings: Understanding When and Where LLM Representations Align with Humans },
author={ Masha Fedzechkina and Eleonora Gualdoni and Sinead Williamson and Katherine Metcalf and Skyler Seto and Barry-John Theobald },
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.15090},
year={ 2025 }
}