ResearchTrend.AI
  • Papers
  • Communities
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Pricing
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 2502.15629
53
1

Mildly Accurate Computationally Differentially Private Inner Product Protocols Imply Oblivious Transfer

24 February 2025
Iftach Haitner
N. Mazor
Jad Silbak
Eliad Tsfadia
Chao Yan
ArXivPDFHTML
Abstract

In distributed differential privacy, multiple parties collaboratively analyze their combined data while protecting the privacy of each party's data from the eyes of the others. Interestingly, for certain fundamental two-party functions like inner product and Hamming distance, the accuracy of distributed solutions significantly lags behind what can be achieved in the centralized model. However, under computational differential privacy, these limitations can be circumvented using oblivious transfer via secure multi-party computation. Yet, no results show that oblivious transfer is indeed necessary for accurately estimating a non-Boolean functionality. In particular, for the inner-product functionality, it was previously unknown whether oblivious transfer is necessary even for the best possible constant additive error.In this work, we prove that any computationally differentially private protocol that estimates the inner product over {−1,1}n×{−1,1}n\{-1,1\}^n \times \{-1,1\}^n{−1,1}n×{−1,1}n up to an additive error of O(n1/6)O(n^{1/6})O(n1/6), can be used to construct oblivious transfer. In particular, our result implies that protocols with sub-polynomial accuracy are equivalent to oblivious transfer. In this accuracy regime, our result improves upon Haitner, Mazor, Silbak, and Tsfadia [STOC '22] who showed that a key-agreement protocol is necessary.

View on arXiv
@article{haitner2025_2502.15629,
  title={ Mildly Accurate Computationally Differentially Private Inner Product Protocols Imply Oblivious Transfer },
  author={ Iftach Haitner and Noam Mazor and Jad Silbak and Eliad Tsfadia and Chao Yan },
  journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.15629},
  year={ 2025 }
}
Comments on this paper