Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have emerged to tackle the challenges of Visual Question Answering (VQA), sparking a new research focus on conducting objective evaluations of these models. Existing evaluation methods face limitations due to the significant human workload required to design Q&A pairs for visual images, which inherently restricts the scale and scope of evaluations. Although automated MLLM-as-judge approaches attempt to reduce the human workload through automatic evaluations, they often introduce biases. To address these problems, we propose an Unsupervised Peer review MLLM Evaluation framework. It utilizes only image data, allowing models to automatically generate questions and conduct peer review assessments of answers from other models, effectively alleviating the reliance on human workload. Additionally, we introduce the vision-language scoring system to mitigate the bias issues, which focuses on three aspects: (i) response correctness; (ii) visual understanding and reasoning; and (iii) image-text correlation. Experimental results demonstrate that UPME achieves a Pearson correlation of 0.944 with human evaluations on the MMstar dataset and 0.814 on the ScienceQA dataset, indicating that our framework closely aligns with human-designed benchmarks and inherent human preferences.
View on arXiv@article{zhang2025_2503.14941,
title={ UPME: An Unsupervised Peer Review Framework for Multimodal Large Language Model Evaluation },
author={ Qihui Zhang and Munan Ning and Zheyuan Liu and Yanbo Wang and Jiayi Ye and Yue Huang and Shuo Yang and Xiao Chen and Yibing Song and Li Yuan },
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.14941},
year={ 2025 }
}