ResearchTrend.AI
  • Papers
  • Communities
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Pricing
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 2504.13785
17
0

Learning Through Retrospection: Improving Trajectory Prediction for Automated Driving with Error Feedback

18 April 2025
Steffen Hagedorn
Aron Distelzweig
Marcel Hallgarten
A. P. Condurache
ArXivPDFHTML
Abstract

In automated driving, predicting trajectories of surrounding vehicles supports reasoning about scene dynamics and enables safe planning for the ego vehicle. However, existing models handle predictions as an instantaneous task of forecasting future trajectories based on observed information. As time proceeds, the next prediction is made independently of the previous one, which means that the model cannot correct its errors during inference and will repeat them. To alleviate this problem and better leverage temporal data, we propose a novel retrospection technique. Through training on closed-loop rollouts the model learns to use aggregated feedback. Given new observations it reflects on previous predictions and analyzes its errors to improve the quality of subsequent predictions. Thus, the model can learn to correct systematic errors during inference. Comprehensive experiments on nuScenes and Argoverse demonstrate a considerable decrease in minimum Average Displacement Error of up to 31.9% compared to the state-of-the-art baseline without retrospection. We further showcase the robustness of our technique by demonstrating a better handling of out-of-distribution scenarios with undetected road-users.

View on arXiv
@article{hagedorn2025_2504.13785,
  title={ Learning Through Retrospection: Improving Trajectory Prediction for Automated Driving with Error Feedback },
  author={ Steffen Hagedorn and Aron Distelzweig and Marcel Hallgarten and Alexandru P. Condurache },
  journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.13785},
  year={ 2025 }
}
Comments on this paper