ResearchTrend.AI
  • Papers
  • Communities
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Pricing
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 2504.14645
51
0

Surrogate Fitness Metrics for Interpretable Reinforcement Learning

20 April 2025
Philipp Altmann
Céline Davignon
Maximilian Zorn
Fabian Ritz
Claudia Linnhoff-Popien
Thomas Gabor
ArXivPDFHTML
Abstract

We employ an evolutionary optimization framework that perturbs initial states to generate informative and diverse policy demonstrations. A joint surrogate fitness function guides the optimization by combining local diversity, behavioral certainty, and global population diversity. To assess demonstration quality, we apply a set of evaluation metrics, including the reward-based optimality gap, fidelity interquartile means (IQMs), fitness composition analysis, and trajectory visualizations. Hyperparameter sensitivity is also examined to better understand the dynamics of trajectory optimization. Our findings demonstrate that optimizing trajectory selection via surrogate fitness metrics significantly improves interpretability of RL policies in both discrete and continuous environments. In gridworld domains, evaluations reveal significantly enhanced demonstration fidelities compared to random and ablated baselines. In continuous control, the proposed framework offers valuable insights, particularly for early-stage policies, while fidelity-based optimization proves more effective for mature policies. By refining and systematically analyzing surrogate fitness functions, this study advances the interpretability of RL models. The proposed improvements provide deeper insights into RL decision-making, benefiting applications in safety-critical and explainability-focused domains.

View on arXiv
@article{altmann2025_2504.14645,
  title={ Surrogate Fitness Metrics for Interpretable Reinforcement Learning },
  author={ Philipp Altmann and Céline Davignon and Maximilian Zorn and Fabian Ritz and Claudia Linnhoff-Popien and Thomas Gabor },
  journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.14645},
  year={ 2025 }
}
Comments on this paper