ResearchTrend.AI
  • Papers
  • Communities
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Pricing
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 2504.21155
16
0

Evaluation and Verification of Physics-Informed Neural Models of the Grad-Shafranov Equation

29 April 2025
Fauzan Nazranda Rizqan
Matthew Hole
Charles Gretton
ArXivPDFHTML
Abstract

Our contributions are motivated by fusion reactors that rely on maintaining magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) equilibrium, where the balance between plasma pressure and confining magnetic fields is required for stable operation. In axisymmetric tokamak reactors in particular, and under the assumption of toroidal symmetry, this equilibrium can be mathematically modelled using the Grad-Shafranov Equation (GSE). Recent works have demonstrated the potential of using Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) to model the GSE. Existing studies did not examine realistic scenarios in which a single network generalizes to a variety of boundary conditions. Addressing that limitation, we evaluate a PINN architecture that incorporates boundary points as network inputs. Additionally, we compare PINN model accuracy and inference speeds with a Fourier Neural Operator (FNO) model. Finding the PINN model to be the most performant, and accurate in our setting, we use the network verification tool Marabou to perform a range of verification tasks. Although we find some discrepancies between evaluations of the networks natively in PyTorch, compared to via Marabou, we are able to demonstrate useful and practical verification workflows. Our study is the first investigation of verification of such networks.

View on arXiv
@article{rizqan2025_2504.21155,
  title={ Evaluation and Verification of Physics-Informed Neural Models of the Grad-Shafranov Equation },
  author={ Fauzan Nazranda Rizqan and Matthew Hole and Charles Gretton },
  journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.21155},
  year={ 2025 }
}
Comments on this paper