ResearchTrend.AI
  • Papers
  • Communities
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Pricing
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 2505.02501
27
0

Corr2Distrib: Making Ambiguous Correspondences an Ally to Predict Reliable 6D Pose Distributions

5 May 2025
Asma Brazi
Boris Meden
Fabrice Mayran de Chamisso
Steve Bourgeois
Vincent Lepetit
    3DH
ArXivPDFHTML
Abstract

We introduce Corr2Distrib, the first correspondence-based method which estimates a 6D camera pose distribution from an RGB image, explaining the observations. Indeed, symmetries and occlusions introduce visual ambiguities, leading to multiple valid poses. While a few recent methods tackle this problem, they do not rely on local correspondences which, according to the BOP Challenge, are currently the most effective way to estimate a single 6DoF pose solution. Using correspondences to estimate a pose distribution is not straightforward, since ambiguous correspondences induced by visual ambiguities drastically decrease the performance of PnP. With Corr2Distrib, we turn these ambiguities into an advantage to recover all valid poses. Corr2Distrib first learns a symmetry-aware representation for each 3D point on the object's surface, characterized by a descriptor and a local frame. This representation enables the generation of 3DoF rotation hypotheses from single 2D-3D correspondences. Next, we refine these hypotheses into a 6DoF pose distribution using PnP and pose scoring. Our experimental evaluations on complex non-synthetic scenes show that Corr2Distrib outperforms state-of-the-art solutions for both pose distribution estimation and single pose estimation from an RGB image, demonstrating the potential of correspondences-based approaches.

View on arXiv
@article{brazi2025_2505.02501,
  title={ Corr2Distrib: Making Ambiguous Correspondences an Ally to Predict Reliable 6D Pose Distributions },
  author={ Asma Brazi and Boris Meden and Fabrice Mayran de Chamisso and Steve Bourgeois and Vincent Lepetit },
  journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.02501},
  year={ 2025 }
}
Comments on this paper