25
0

WebGen-Bench: Evaluating LLMs on Generating Interactive and Functional Websites from Scratch

Abstract

LLM-based agents have demonstrated great potential in generating and managing code within complex codebases. In this paper, we introduce WebGen-Bench, a novel benchmark designed to measure an LLM-based agent's ability to create multi-file website codebases from scratch. It contains diverse instructions for website generation, created through the combined efforts of human annotators and GPT-4o. These instructions span three major categories and thirteen minor categories, encompassing nearly all important types of web applications. To assess the quality of the generated websites, we use GPT-4o to generate test cases targeting each functionality described in the instructions, and then manually filter, adjust, and organize them to ensure accuracy, resulting in 647 test cases. Each test case specifies an operation to be performed on the website and the expected result after the operation. To automate testing and improve reproducibility, we employ a powerful web-navigation agent to execute tests on the generated websites and determine whether the observed responses align with the expected results. We evaluate three high-performance code-agent frameworks,this http URL, OpenHands, and Aider, using multiple proprietary and open-source LLMs as engines. The best-performing combination,this http URLpowered by DeepSeek-R1, achieves only 27.8\% accuracy on the test cases, highlighting the challenging nature of our benchmark. Additionally, we construct WebGen-Instruct, a training set consisting of 6,667 website-generation instructions. Training Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct onthis http URLtrajectories generated from a subset of this training set achieves an accuracy of 38.2\%, surpassing the performance of the best proprietary model.

View on arXiv
@article{lu2025_2505.03733,
  title={ WebGen-Bench: Evaluating LLMs on Generating Interactive and Functional Websites from Scratch },
  author={ Zimu Lu and Yunqiao Yang and Houxing Ren and Haotian Hou and Han Xiao and Ke Wang and Weikang Shi and Aojun Zhou and Mingjie Zhan and Hongsheng Li },
  journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.03733},
  year={ 2025 }
}
Comments on this paper