ResearchTrend.AI
  • Papers
  • Communities
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Pricing
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 2505.05026
26
0

G-FOCUS: Towards a Robust Method for Assessing UI Design Persuasiveness

8 May 2025
Jaehyun Jeon
Janghan Yoon
Minsoo Kim
Sumin Shim
Yejin Choi
Hanbin Kim
Youngjae Yu
    AAML
ArXivPDFHTML
Abstract

Evaluating user interface (UI) design effectiveness extends beyond aesthetics to influencing user behavior, a principle central to Design Persuasiveness. A/B testing is the predominant method for determining which UI variations drive higher user engagement, but it is costly and time-consuming. While recent Vision-Language Models (VLMs) can process automated UI analysis, current approaches focus on isolated design attributes rather than comparative persuasiveness-the key factor in optimizing user interactions. To address this, we introduce WiserUI-Bench, a benchmark designed for Pairwise UI Design Persuasiveness Assessment task, featuring 300 real-world UI image pairs labeled with A/B test results and expert rationales. Additionally, we propose G-FOCUS, a novel inference-time reasoning strategy that enhances VLM-based persuasiveness assessment by reducing position bias and improving evaluation accuracy. Experimental results show that G-FOCUS surpasses existing inference strategies in consistency and accuracy for pairwise UI evaluation. Through promoting VLM-driven evaluation of UI persuasiveness, our work offers an approach to complement A/B testing, propelling progress in scalable UI preference modeling and design optimization. Code and data will be released publicly.

View on arXiv
@article{jeon2025_2505.05026,
  title={ G-FOCUS: Towards a Robust Method for Assessing UI Design Persuasiveness },
  author={ Jaehyun Jeon and Jang Han Yoon and Min Soo Kim and Sumin Shim and Yejin Choi and Hanbin Kim and Youngjae Yu },
  journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.05026},
  year={ 2025 }
}
Comments on this paper