Observational studies are a key resource for causal inference but are often affected by systematic biases. Prior work has focused mainly on detecting these biases, via sensitivity analyses and comparisons with randomized controlled trials, or mitigating them through debiasing techniques. However, there remains a lack of methodology for uncovering the underlying mechanisms driving these biases, e.g., whether due to hidden confounding or selection of participants. In this work, we show that the relationship between bias magnitude and the predictive performance of nuisance function estimators (in the observational study) can help distinguish among common sources of causal bias. We validate our methodology through extensive synthetic experiments and a real-world case study, demonstrating its effectiveness in revealing the mechanisms behind observed biases. Our framework offers a new lens for understanding and characterizing bias in observational studies, with practical implications for improving causal inference.
View on arXiv@article{demirel2025_2506.01191,
title={ Uncovering Bias Mechanisms in Observational Studies },
author={ Ilker Demirel and Zeshan Hussain and Piersilvio De Bartolomeis and David Sontag },
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.01191},
year={ 2025 }
}