ResearchTrend.AI
  • Papers
  • Communities
  • Events
  • Blog
  • Pricing
Papers
Communities
Social Events
Terms and Conditions
Pricing
Parameter LabParameter LabTwitterGitHubLinkedInBlueskyYoutube

© 2025 ResearchTrend.AI, All rights reserved.

  1. Home
  2. Papers
  3. 2506.01885
36
0

SoK: Concurrency in Blockchain - A Systematic Literature Review and the Unveiling of a Misconception

2 June 2025
Atefeh Zareh Chahoki
Maurice Herlihy
Marco Roveri
ArXiv (abs)PDFHTML
Main:25 Pages
4 Figures
Bibliography:10 Pages
6 Tables
Appendix:2 Pages
Abstract

Smart contracts, the cornerstone of blockchain technology, enable secure, automated distributed execution. Given their role in handling large transaction volumes across clients, miners, and validators, exploring concurrency is critical. This includes concurrent transaction execution or validation within blocks, block processing across shards, and miner competition to select and persist transactions. Concurrency and parallelism are a double-edged sword: while they improve throughput, they also introduce risks like race conditions, non-determinism, and vulnerabilities such as deadlock and livelock.This paper presents the first survey of concurrency in smart contracts, offering a systematic literature review organized into key dimensions. First, it establishes a taxonomy of concurrency levels in blockchain systems and discusses proposed solutions for future adoption. Second, it examines vulnerabilities, attacks, and countermeasures in concurrent operations, emphasizing the need for correctness and security. Crucially, we reveal a flawed concurrency assumption in a major research category, which has led to widespread misinterpretation. This work aims to correct that and guide future research toward more accurate models. Finally, we identify gaps in each category to outline future research directions and support blockchain's advancement.

View on arXiv
@article{chahoki2025_2506.01885,
  title={ SoK: Concurrency in Blockchain - A Systematic Literature Review and the Unveiling of a Misconception },
  author={ Atefeh Zareh Chahoki and Maurice Herlihy and Marco Roveri },
  journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.01885},
  year={ 2025 }
}
Comments on this paper