As cyber threats become more sophisticated, rapid and accurate vulnerability detection is essential for maintaining secure systems. This study explores the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) in software vulnerability assessment by simulating the identification of Python code with known Common Weakness Enumerations (CWEs), comparing zero-shot, few-shot cross-domain, and few-shot in-domain prompting strategies. Our results indicate that while zero-shot prompting performs poorly, few-shot prompting significantly enhances classification performance, particularly when integrated with confidence-based routing strategies that improve efficiency by directing human experts to cases where model uncertainty is high, optimizing the balance between automation and expert oversight. We find that LLMs can effectively generalize across vulnerability categories with minimal examples, suggesting their potential as scalable, adaptable cybersecurity tools in simulated environments. However, challenges such as model reliability, interpretability, and adversarial robustness remain critical areas for future research. By integrating AI-driven approaches with expert-in-the-loop (EITL) decision-making, this work highlights a pathway toward more efficient and responsive cybersecurity workflows. Our findings provide a foundation for deploying AI-assisted vulnerability detection systems in both real and simulated environments that enhance operational resilience while reducing the burden on human analysts.
View on arXiv@article{farr2025_2506.10104,
title={ Expert-in-the-Loop Systems with Cross-Domain and In-Domain Few-Shot Learning for Software Vulnerability Detection },
author={ David Farr and Kevin Talty and Alexandra Farr and John Stockdale and Iain Cruickshank and Jevin West },
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.10104},
year={ 2025 }
}